This benchmark table shows how companies in the Canadian Information Technology industry are performing based on key financial indicators. It uses five percentiles (90th, 75th, Median, 25th, and 10th) to highlight where a company stands compared to others.

Total Revenue (Median = $60.90M)      Half of the companies earn less than $60.9 million. Only the top 10% earn over $2.3 billion. 
Operating Income (Median = -$1.26M)      The average company is actually losing money after covering basic operating costs.
Net Income (Median = -$2.69M)            Many companies in this field are not profitable. 
Gross Margin (Median = 0.53)              This shows how much money is left after paying for production costs. A margin above 0.81 is considered excellent. 
Operating Margin (Median = -0.04)        A negative median means many firms are not covering their expenses. 
Return on Assets (ROA = -0.09)            Many companies aren’t earning returns from their assets.
Return on Equity (ROE = -0.08)             The typical company is giving investors negative returns. 
Asset Turnover (Median = 0.58)            This tells us how well companies turn assets into revenue. 

This chart shows 63 companies in Canada’s Information Technology industry, based on total revenue. These companies come from 14 different sectors—like software, hardware, semiconductors, IT services, data processing, and electronics—giving a full picture of how the industry is performing. Focusing on the top earners makes it easier to spot the biggest players and compare other companies to them.

Company/Group – What It Tells Us
Celestica Inc.
Celestica has the highest revenue in the group. It's a great example to use when comparing how big or successful ASUS is in this industry.

Canadian Solar Inc. & Open Text Corp.
These two companies also bring in a lot of revenue and sit right behind Celestica. They’re good points of comparison for ASUS to measure up against other top performers.

Mid-Sized Companies
Companies like TELUS International, Converge, and Nuvei make less than the biggest names but may be more similar to ASUS in terms of size and business scale.

Smaller Companies
These companies make under $100 million in revenue each year. They represent the smaller end of the IT industry and don’t have as much impact in the overall market.

This map gives a big-picture view of the environment ASUS works in. To build its laptops, graphics cards, and other tech products, ASUS depends on suppliers that provide key parts. Once made, these products are passed through distributors and retailers to reach customers and businesses.

Key Points
Everything is Connected
The tech hardware space is linked to many other industries that help ASUS make and sell its products.

ASUS Needs Reliable Partners
The company relies on steady supplies from chip makers, component suppliers, and manufacturers to keep production smooth.

Widespread Impact
ASUS products don’t just go to individual consumers—they also support other industries like healthcare, finance, and education.

Industry Trends Matter
If other connected sectors are growing or shrinking, it can affect how much demand there is for ASUS products.

Apple, Samsung, and Dell are top competitors. 

This visual map shows where ASUS fits into the Canadian tech industry and how it's connected to other related sectors. ASUS is placed in the "Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals" category, which is its main line of business.

Key Takeaways
ASUS’s Core Area
ASUS is at the center of this map, under the Technology Hardware sector (highlighted in yellow). This is its main industry in Canada.

Linked Sectors
ASUS’s industry is closely connected to others like:

Electronic Manufacturing Services – likely suppliers.

Electronic Components & Equipment – hardware and accessories.

Systems Software – related to ASUS’s software needs.

Technology Distributors – help get products to customers.

IT Consulting & Data Services – may support ASUS with tech operations.

Wider Industry View
Other tech areas like Software, Semiconductors, and Internet Services are also shown. ASUS may not directly work in these sectors, but they are part of the larger ecosystem.

Color Gradient
The color bar at the top shows revenue size. Red means high median revenue, and blue/green means lower. This helps spot strong-performing sectors.

This chart helps us see how ASUS fits into Canada’s IT industry. It shows who their potential partners, suppliers, or even competitors might be—and gives insight into areas of growth or collaboration.

This radar chart compares ASUS with other tech companies based on key financial numbers from 2023. Each axis represents a different financial metric like revenue, profit, or income.

ASUS vs. Competitors
ASUS (Blue Shape): The blue area shows ASUS’s performance across five financial metrics:
Total Revenue: $15719.73M
Gross Profit: $2359.49M
Operating Income: $363.52M
Profit Before Tax: $720.08M
Net Income: $583.07M

Other Companies: Other colored shapes represent competitors like Apple, Dell, HP, Acer, MSI, and Foxconn. Bigger shapes generally mean bigger financial size.

Key Takeaways
The chart gives a clear snapshot of how ASUS stacks up against others in the tech hardware space.
It shows where ASUS is strong and where it might lag behind top players like Apple or Dell.
This visual is useful for quickly spotting performance gaps or strengths in ASUS’s financial profile.

This table compares ASUSTeK Computer Inc.'s financial performance in 2023 with its peers in the Technology Hardware industry. It highlights key metrics related to profitability, financial health, growth, and operational efficiency, helping us see how ASUS stacks up against other companies.

Breakdown:
Company and Percentile Information:
ASUS's Financial Values: These columns show ASUS's actual values for each metric in 2023.
Percentile Rank: This shows where ASUS stands in comparison to its peers. For example, a 75th percentile rank means ASUS performed better than 75% of its competitors.
Benchmark Percentiles (90th, 75th, 50th, 25th, 10th): These columns provide reference points, showing the performance of top, middle, and bottom performers in the industry.
Status: This indicates whether ASUS's performance is considered "Normal," "High," or "Low" compared to its peers.
Unit: Shows the measurement unit for each metric (e.g., percentage, days).

Profitability:
Gross Margin (15%, 31st Percentile, Normal): ASUS’s margin is at 15%, meaning 69% of its peers had a higher margin. There's room for improvement.
Operating Margin (2.3%, 43rd Percentile, Normal): A 2.3% operating margin suggests ASUS is slightly below the industry median.
Net Margin (3.7%, 48th Percentile, Normal): ASUS’s net margin is close to the industry average, indicating typical overall profitability.
Return on Assets (3.7%, 54th Percentile, Normal): ASUS is slightly above the median, showing average efficiency in using assets.
Return on Invested Capital (5.4%, 54th Percentile, Normal): ASUS's return on invested capital is also just above average.

Financial Health:
Free Cash Flow / Total Cost (10.5%, 58th Percentile, Normal): ASUS has a strong ability to generate cash, performing better than the median.
Current Ratio (1.55, 27th Percentile, Normal): A ratio of 1.55 suggests ASUS might face liquidity challenges compared to its peers.
Liability to Asset Ratio (46%, 59th Percentile, Normal): ASUS has a lower level of financial leverage, which is slightly better than the median.

Growth:
Total Revenue Growth (-10.4%, 48th Percentile, Normal): ASUS saw a decline in revenue, similar to many of its peers.
Operating Income Growth (-14.2%, 60th Percentile, Normal): ASUS’s operating income dropped, but less severely than many competitors.
Net Income Growth (6.1%, 75th Percentile, High): ASUS saw a strong increase in net income, outperforming most peers.
Free Cash Flow Growth: Not available for 2023.

Operational Efficiency:
SG&A Costs / Total Revenue (8.2%, 35th Percentile, Normal): ASUS's overhead costs are higher than most of its peers, suggesting room for cost-saving improvements.
Inventory Days (109, 65th Percentile, Normal): ASUS holds inventory for 109 days, which is slower than many competitors.
Cash Conversion Cycle (120.4 days, 65th Percentile, Normal): It takes ASUS 120 days to turn its investments into cash, indicating a longer-than-average cycle.

Overall Summary:
In 2023, ASUS showed mixed performance:
Profitability is generally around the industry median, with room for improvement in margins.
Financial Health looks good, but liquidity could be a concern due to a low current ratio.
Growth was weak in revenue and operating income, but strong net income growth outperformed many peers.
Operational Efficiency shows potential for improvement, particularly in managing costs and inventory turnover.

This stacked bar chart shows how ASUS's inventory is divided into different categories across three regions in 2023: Taiwan, Canada, and the United States. It gives a clear picture of what ASUS holds in each area.

Chart Breakdown:
X-axis: Represents regions: Taiwan, Canada, and the United States.
Y-axis: Shows the percentage of total inventory (from 0% to 100%).

Stacked Bars: Each bar represents total inventory in a region, broken down into color-coded categories:
Blue: Raw Materials, Consumables & Supplies
Red: Work-in-Process
Green: Finished Goods & Merchandise
Orange: Other Inventories

Key Insights:
Taiwan: The majority of ASUS’s inventory are here (Orange ), suggesting Taiwan is mainly a production or component-sourcing hub for ASUS. Only a small portion is finished goods (red).

Canada: In Canada, almost all the inventory (98.75) is raw materials (blue), indicating this region is primarily focused on selling or distributing completed products.

United States: The US shows a mix of inventory types: around 41.26% raw materials (blue), 30.72% finished goods (green), and 21.62% other inventories (Orange), 6.40% work in progress. This suggests the US is involved in both manufacturing and selling.

Key Takeaways:
Regional Roles: Taiwan seems focused on sourcing and production, Canada on distribution, and the US balances manufacturing with distribution.

This table compares ASUSTeK Computer Inc. with other major technology companies based on three key financial indicators in 2023: Net Income, Total Revenue, and Inventory. All values are in million USD.

Key Metrics:
Net Income: This shows the profit (or loss) of each company after expenses and taxes.
Total Revenue: This reflects the total sales made by each company.
Inventory: This shows the value of goods and materials each company has in stock.

ASUS Comparison:
Net Income: ASUS made $583.07 million, which is much lower than tech giants like Apple ($96,995 million), Microsoft ($72,361 million), and Meta Platforms ($39,098 million). However, it is higher than companies like Acer ($3.95 million), HTC (a loss of $110.68 million), and BlackBerry (a loss of $734 million).
Total Revenue: ASUS earned $15,719.73 million, significantly less than Apple ($383,285 million), Microsoft ($211,915 million), and Meta Platforms ($134,902 million). However, it outperformed Acer ($67.98 million), BlackBerry ($656 million), HTC ($143.99 million), and Motorola Solutions ($9,978 million).
Inventory: ASUS holds $4,002.02 million in inventory, which is less than Apple ($6,331 million), HP ($6,862 million), and Dell ($4,776 million). But ASUS holds more inventory than Acer ($3.36 million), BlackBerry ($656 million), HTC ($37.98 million), Meta ($2,500 million), Microsoft ($2,500 million), Motorola ($827 million), and NVIDIA ($5,159 million).

Key Insights:
Scale: There’s a big difference in size between ASUS and giants like Apple and Microsoft in terms of both revenue and profit.
Profitability: ASUS is profitable, but its profit margin is lower than companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Meta.
Inventory Management: ASUS holds a significant amount of inventory, which could be an area to explore further, especially regarding how efficiently it manages inventory.
Competitive Position: ASUS is strong in the hardware sector but doesn’t match the size or profits of software and platform companies like Apple or Microsoft.